Factors in Communicative Events

Communicative events involve:

  • a definite meaning and reference
  • in a specific context &
  • within the psychosocial reality
  • as produced by a group.

Each Level/element of communication will be taken in turn and examined from these four perspectives. Links that enable return to the topic are provided.

L7: Openness

Review Openness

In sending, openness allows for a range of possible meanings, both in relation to yourself (as sender or receiver) and others who may be attending to you.

Reception depends on sensitivity. Unless you are alert and perceptive in relation to what may be pertinent at the moment of the event, it will be missed.

Openness links to a group's psychosocial reality by using free-floating attention that allows awareness of implications, especially if they have significance for group interactions.

The most important feature of the context is that there should be no danger or threat. If there is, you will be too preoccupied to properly attend to communications.

L6: Meanings

Review Meaning

In sending, specific meanings structure the use of all Levels to manipulate the experience of recipients and provide some control over what is being referred to.

Reception depends on comprehension (grasping the meaning). Except in unusual circumstances, there is a natural disposition to make sense as expected by the sender (however rarely that is achieved).

Meanings that lies within the sphere of one's own group seems wholly natural, while meanings that are within the psychosocial reality of another group will be more difficult to express or to comprehend. The meaning may seem odd, or even bizarre.

The context may need to be actively managed in order to support or clarify the desired meaning.

L5: Terms

Review Term

In sending, naming and terms must capture or limit meaning because there is a need to reduce confusion about what is being referred to during any communicative event.

Reception requires knowledge of usage via definitions so as to recognize the essence of whatever the term is referring to, &/or descriptions to appreciate its properties.

The sender normally operates within their group's reality, while a receiver normally seeks to discriminate and be precise in accord with their own needs and interests. The receiver's most important group has a major effect in this regard. If both share the same relevant social group, there is much less difficulty.

Context may alter the reference of a term and the relevant group reality. It often assists when a term has many references (as is rather common with words).

L4: Symbols

Review Symbol

In sending, symbols elaborate or transform meaning by making reference to anything that is deemed appropriate.

Reception occurs through a reading of the symbols being used. Normally the symbols force attention immediately to relevant attributions. However, a readiness to read with more discernment, and not to dismiss symbols as mysterious can be useful.

Symbols are standardized within any group or society: they are the royal road to making sense of a group's psychosocial reality. So clashes here, due to context, can lead to painful experiences on both sides.

L3: Signs

Review Sign

In sending, signs are used to indicate, translate and activate meanings with reference to a single domain.

Reception depends on appreciation of significance. That means familiarity and knowledge about the specific domain within which the sign is regarded as indicative. 

The context plays a major role in both pointing to the relevant domain and rapidly creating that relevance. The sign may contribute to a useful and valid picture of the overall situation.

Signs are important to groups who view themselves as significant players in the particular domain. If a group is associated with possession of expertise, then its psychosocial reality may come to dominate perception and reception and subsequent communicative events. «When you are an expert with a hammer, then everything looks like a nail.»

L2: Signals

Review Signal

In sending, signals are used when a direct, inflexible and unambiguous reference to a specific meaning is desired.

Reception is based on recognition. To receive a signal you have to learn all the essential rules, and also any relevant adjustments that apply at the moment of use.

The context is also important insofar as signals require contextual support to avoid producing mixed messages. It may also determine whether or not the communicative event is indeed a signal-L2.

The relevant group plays a major part in designing signals. It also ensures (e.g. via training, examination, certification) that its members, and others if necessary, are able to send and recognize signals.

L1: Stimuli

Review Stimulus

The sender generates stimuli, but these are not inherently meaningful as such. They only become meaningful when part of higher Level entities.

The group should recognize the importance of sufficiently intact biological sense organs for proper social interaction and participation in group activities. It may choose to provide assistance for those who have a sensory handicap.

Context is relevant in that it may mask perception or disturb generation of the stimulus.

Reception is another matter entirely: noticing is the key. If someone, taken to be a relevant sender generates stimuli, then they are likely to be attributed a meaning or reference of some sort.

But everyone and their context generate stimuli all the time. So, as a recipient, you are in a difficult position. You must stay alert and avoid allowing stimuli to be screened out by habit, adaptation or for comfort, while simultaneously avoiding being overwhelmed.

Read more about the unique position of a recipient.


ClosedMore Review Options ►

Originally posted:  30-Jul-2011; Last updated: 25-Sep-2011